Smart Systems for Health stung by privacy review

The Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (IPC) published a report lambasting the SSHA, which is involved with a range of activities that include identity management, portal services and securing e-mail.The IPC review included a look at more than one hundred documents as well as a visit to one of the SSHA’s employee training sessions and a meeting with its chief privacy officer. The SSHA had been given a checklist of what staff would be looking for prior to the review.

“The documentation provided indicated that a comprehensive suite of privacy and security policies and procedures have not been adopted or developed by the SSHA,” the IPC says, which has been posted on SSHA’s Web site.

“Even where privacy and security policies and procedures have been developed or adopted, there are instances where those polices and procedures have not been compiled with or have not been followed in a systematic or verifiable manner.”

The report also criticizes SSHA’s privacy staff for not having direct operational responsibility for accomplishing its privacy and security objectives. Although the SSHA does have a policy, it is not completely in line with the Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA), which governs the privacy of health-care data.

SSHA has been mired in problems and criticism since the beginning of the year, when it consulting firm Deloitte published an in-depth critique of the agency’s track record, achievements and practices. It concluded, among other things, that it has no strategic plan, little visibility or support from other health-care organizations and inadequate security.

It has also been dealing with the departure of its founding CEO and last month appointed Bill Albino, a former EDS executive, to take over.

A letter from Albino that has also been posted on the organization’s Web site responds to the IPC report with a promise to deal with 57 of the recommendations by August. Thirteen other areas will require changes that could take some time, SSHA spokesman Paul Kilbertus said.

“It’s deeper into the organization. It involves change to the design and organization of how we do things. We’re going to start work on those immediately,” he said, adding that SSHA has been given no deadline on when it needs to report back.

Another 12 recommendations will demand involvement from the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Kilbertus said, which has also received a copy of the report.

“They want to leave the onus on us – ‘You go on and lead this effort, because it’s mainly directed at you – but they will be at the table with us.”

SSHA will be bringing in outside consultants to assist with addressing its privacy issues, Kilbertus said.

So far, the organization has retained the services of retired Deloitte privacy specialist Robert Parker and Sharon Cohen, former CEO of Ontario Shared Services.

Would you recommend this article?

Share

Thanks for taking the time to let us know what you think of this article!
We'd love to hear your opinion about this or any other story you read in our publication.


Jim Love, Chief Content Officer, IT World Canada

Featured Download

Shane Schick
Shane Schick
Your guide to the ongoing story of how technology is changing the world
Previous article
Next article

Featured Story

How the CTO can Maintain Cloud Momentum Across the Enterprise

Embracing cloud is easy for some individuals. But embedding widespread cloud adoption at the enterprise level is...

Related Tech News

Get ITBusiness Delivered

Our experienced team of journalists brings you engaging content targeted to IT professionals and line-of-business executives delivered directly to your inbox.

Featured Tech Jobs